Ho il nikon 18-35 G che trovo otticamente favoloso, ma al tempo stesso i 18 mm temo possano essere un po' troppi, soprattutto in vista di un viaggio in Islanda. Anche l'assenza di stabilizzazione alle volte mi ha creato problemi. Così l'altro giorno ho preso su eBay a 600 euro un 16-35 VR, che però mi arriva solo in giornata .qundi e' un discorso di usabilita' bastano i 18mm? Pero avere un f4 fisso e vr e' un altra cosa. Quoto in toto Daniele,per quanto mi riguarda l'F4 fisso col VR e soprattutto i 2 mm in più fanno la differenza The Angry Photographer: 16-35mm f/4G vs 18-35. Nikon Lens Secrets to save you $ Opinioni, caratteristiche tecniche e foto scattate con il Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED, obiettivo grandangolare per formato FF e APS-C, prodotto dal 2013. La messa a fuoco avviene tramite Motore AF a ultrasuoni (Rin..
. I have the 16-35 f4 VR and what you describe is just about spot on, I very much like mine as it is a great travel lens.-- hide signature --Lance B 16-35 vs. 17-35 vs. 18-35 In reply to Andrew 3 • Feb 5, 2016 Andrew 3 wrote. Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Advantages Better Build quality: the 16-35mm feels a lot more solid in the hand and it is also weather sealed. Constant f/4 Aperture: Variable aperture zooms aren't as convenient to use since the aperture changes as you zoom. However, the difference between the 16-35mm and the 18-35mm max aperture is less than a half stop at the extremes (3.5 vs 4 and 4.5 vs 4) I headed out for a sunrise shoot to test out the Nikon 17-35mm f2.8 and the Nikon 16-35mm f4 to see if I can pick the difference NIKON D800E + 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 @ 35mm, ISO 100, 1/80, f/5.6. So in a way, it can be considered as a budget version of the 16-35mm f/4. In this review, I will be comparing the Nikon 18-35mm to its AF-D predecessor, as well as the Nikon 16-35mm f/4G VR in terms of optics, features and handling
Del 18-35 mi piace parecchio la nitidezza pari (o quasi) al 16-35 e soprattutto il peso inferiore ma il 16-35 lo vedo come un grandangolo completo... f/4 costante, VR e diaframma a 9 lamelle... Io amo scattare lunghe esposizioni notturne a diaframma chiuso e penso che un confronto tra il 16-35 ed il 18-35 su questo tipo di foto potrebbe dare diversi risultati Opinioni, caratteristiche tecniche e foto scattate con il Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art, obiettivo standard per formato APS-C, prodotto dal 2013. La messa a fuoco avviene tramite Motore AF a ultrasuoni (Ring-USM), non &..
Ultra wide angle zoom lens from Nikon review with samples -Released in 2000,compatible with fx and dx dslr from Nikon. Thank you for watching,if you like it you can subscribe to my channel. https. Nikon 18 35 in vendita: scopri subito migliaia di annunci di privati e aziende e trova quello che cerchi su Subito.i
The Nikon 18-35 (better than the 16-35) or the 20 1.8 prime are probably better fits for what you want. On a d7100 the Sigma 18-35 is hard to beat, a move to fx is not necessarily an upgrade, its just different, and if you want reach then its good to have a capable DX camera around 16-35/4 VR vs. 18-35 2010 Any one conduct a comparasion test between these two lenses? I have the 18-35 on D700, and thinking of the new 16-35, but would like to see some shots first. Cheers! Nikon Coolpix 4500 Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-M1 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm F2.8G IF-ED VR Nikon PC-E Nikkor 24mm f/3.5D ED +9 more Visita eBay per trovare una vasta selezione di nikon 16-35. Scopri le migliori offerte, subito a casa, in tutta sicurezza Visita eBay per trovare una vasta selezione di nikon 18 35. Scopri le migliori offerte, subito a casa, in tutta sicurezza
The Sigma 18-35 F1.8 is one of the best zoom lenses ever made, it even won our best lens of 2013 award. Since its release, Nikon has brought out a series of wonderful F1.8 FX primes nikon 16-35=685g nikon 17-35=745g nuovo nikon 18-35=385g Marcus Fenix. Jan 29 2013, 03:42 PM. QUOTE(pisistrate nelson @ Jan 29 2013, 03:03 PM) L'ha chiamata così Marcus Fenix ma non credo che intendesse questo in modo dispregiativo ma solo perché le altre che ha mensionato lo sono state definite prima che lo facesse lui qui Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR on Nikon D800 vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED on Nikon D800E COMPARISON SELECTION (3 selected items max.) VIEW COMPARISON ADD MOR Visita eBay per trovare una vasta selezione di nikon 16 35. Scopri le migliori offerte, subito a casa, in tutta sicurezza
Brief review for Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR: A fast, affordable wide-angle zoom This lens is the first Nikon wide-angle that features optical stabilization.The Nikon 16-35mm was primarily designed for full-frame cameras; however, it is also usable with APS-C sensor cameras such as the Nikon D7000 or Nikon D5100, with a 25-50mm equivalent range, which makes it a short trans-standard. 16-35 vs 17-35 dico 17-35 perchè è f/2 io non scarterei a priori il 18-35 afd CA e altro. I sensori 24-36 Mp di Nikon (eccetto la D800e) ci aggiungono con i loro filtri AA buone dosi di CA ulteriore, fortunatamente ricorretta, e di astigmatismo o smearing e curvatura di campo addizionale Sicuramente tra il 16-35 e il 18-35 preferirei il 18 anche solo per il prezzo. Sono d'accordo con te sulla questione peso/qualità. Infatti il mio intento è quello di portare a casa con un prezzo che non vada oltre i 700 la massima qualità (fotografica) possibile, e di questo 18'ino ne parlano veramente bene If you compare the Nikon 18-35 mm f/3.5-f/4.5 with the Nikon 16-35 mm f/4, then both are suited for both FX and DX cameras, but this new zoom is lower in price (by almost 500 euro). I shoot a lot and with pleasure with a wide-angle zoom lens and prefer a focal length of 24 mm (converted to a full frame sensor) or smaller
. The measurement errors ranged from 0.2 to 1.4 lpmm. It's worth reminding here that in the case of tests based on the D3x the decency level is set near 30-32 lpmm and the best fixed focus lenses can reach as high as about 47-49 lpmm Nikon Club Ufficiale è la community del nikonista, Con il permesso vorrei aprire il club del nuovo 18-35 G, che credo tra poco prenderò! o il 16-35 f/4 nuovo o il 17-35 f2.8 usato (vedi tread da me aperto),.
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Era l'anno 2010 quando Nikon decise di presentare il suo nuovo grandangolo di fascia professionale da affiancare al gioiello di casa; il Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8!!! Per garantirsi un adeguato successo commerciale, Nikon, ha sviluppato questo nuovo obiettivo con criteri più... diciamo, comuni a tutte le altre ottiche Nikon. The Nikon 16-35/4 VR is the most practical and least expensive. It's what I use, and I own all the other Nikon lenses which stay home. Easy choice here. The Nikon 14-24/2.8G is a huge beast that can't take filters and has a less practical zoom range Qual è la differenza fra Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM A e Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM? Scopri quale è il migliore e la loro prestazione generale nella classifica obbiettivi per macchine fotografiche Canon Nikon 16-35 VR set to 16mm, f/4 at 1/15 at ISO 200 on FX hand-held. Full-resolution image. Desert Home, 26 September 2017, 7:12 PM. Nikon D850, Nikon 16-35mm VR at 16mm, 15 seconds at f/7.1 at ISO 200. bigger or camera-original LARGE NORMAL JPG. Great Room, Ahwahnee Hotel, Yosemite Valley, 18 October 2014, 8:04 AM
.8D ED-IF AF-S Nikkor ~$1,500 We haven't yet reviewed this lens (an oversight we hope to rectify in the near future) but until the 16-35mm ƒ/4 came along, the 17-35mm ƒ/2.8 was. Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED on Nikon D800 vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED on Nikon D800 vs Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR on Nikon D80 Qual è la differenza fra Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM A e Sony FE 16-35mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T*? Scopri quale è il migliore e la loro prestazione generale nella classifica obbiettivi per macchine fotografiche
Da possessore del Nikon 18 35 G non posso far altro che consigliartelo, - Il Nikkor G pesa 380g contro i 600g del Tokina: se proprio devo avere un obiettivo pesante preferisco avere il Nikkor 16-35 f/4 VR almeno è stabilizzato e mi offre la focale 16mm dove un solo millimetro può fare la differenza... Lightworks Nikon 18-35mm ƒ/3.5-4.5D ED-IF AF ~$570 The previous version of the 18-35mm fared very well on our D200 DX test body, however, we never had an opportunity to see the lens mounted on a full-frame. Introduction Nikon offers several wide-angle zoom lenses. Most of these target professional users and consequently deliver very good if not exceptional performance. However, these lenses are also quite expensive and because of that usually not an option for amateurs. There is an affordable Nikon wide zoom, though, the Nikkor AF-D 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5
Comparison: Nikon 17-35 vs. 16-35 The feeling and looking. The 17-35mm does not feel as quite slick and consistent as the 16-35 mm, which makes the 16-35mm look more professional. The 16-35mm is also taller and a little bit lighter, more plasticky nikon 16-35 f4N vs 18-35 G เอาตัวไหนดี . เลือกไม่ถูกครับ ผมคิดจะย้ายามาจาก canon จะมา d610 ครับ ก่อนหน้านี้ใช้ 17-40 f4L ของ canon อยู่ -คุณภาพที่ได้ 2. Home › Lens Comparison › Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 vs Tamron 17-35mm OSD **This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 vs Tamron 17-35mm OSD Lens Compariso The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is a professional ultra-wide angle lens. Aimed mainly at full-frame DSLR users, but also compatible with DX bodies where it provides a focal range of 24-50mm, the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 also features built-in optical image stabilization. Read our in-depth Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Review complete with full-size sample images
Nikon 16-35 f/4 Price/Value & Similar Lenses. The Nikon 16-35 f/4 isn't the cheapest lens you'll find but unfortunately most wide angle zooms aren't. If you aren't opposed to getting a non-Nikon brand lens you will have a couple more options available to you, at lower price points The Nikon 16-35 mm f/4G ED VR II AF-S Nikkor, since the beginning of 2010 for sale, proves this is not an ubiquitous rule. Many people wonder whether there will be lenses good enough for a 36 megapixel camera. This review of the Nikon 16-35 mm in combination with the Nikon D800E shows there are In my Nikon AF-S 16-35/4. review I'll put this zoom to the test on a 36MP Nikon D800 body to see whether it's a good match for the highest resolution full-frame DSLR. Optics: 17 elements in 12 groups vs. 12 elements in 8 groups for the 18-35. Pretty complex design with a lot of glass/air-surfaces Last year Sigma made history when they released an 18-35mm zoom with a wicked-fast f/1.8 aperture. Up until then, the fastest wide-to-normal zoom you could get for your crop-sensor camera was. Obiettivo zoom NIKKOR grandangolare estremo, altamente professionale, con portata dello zoom di 14-24 mm (DX equivalente: 21-36mm mm). Questo obiettivo ad elevata luminosità, progettato per la fotografia digitale, è provvisto di un rivestimento nano-crystal e lenti in vetro ED ed offre un'eccezionale nitidezza ai bordi
I currently have the 16-35 f4 and have to say it's very good. I was recommended the 16-35 f4 over the older 18-35 by a friend due to corner sharpness on fx. Weight wise the new 18-35 is 385g compared to 685g of the 16-35, it is double the weight but for most people 300g extra isn't too much of an issue. Filters shouldn't be an issue for either Nikon 17-35 F2.8 vs Nikon 18-35 F3.5-4.5. Discussion in 'Nikon' started by sonicpnl, Jun 16, 2003. I mostly use it with Nikon's A2 or L37c filters I have no shooting experience with 17-35 Nikkor but recently I tested my 18-35 against Canon's 16-35/2.8L owned by a friend
Read our detailed comparison of the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f4G ED VR vs Nikon AF Nikkor 18-35mm f3.5-4.5D IF ED to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose .8 (A) AF DC HSM,: 590,57 € | Canon EF EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L EF II USM Lens: 473,88 € | Sigma 884
What is the difference between Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM A and Sony FE 16-35mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T*? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking I have had the 16-35 for a few years know and toyed with the idea of selling it to get the Tamron 15-30 after its great reviews, but stuck with the Nikon purely on the filter issue. I just couldn't be bothered mucking around with filter kits for it, when all my other lenses share the 77mm thread In 2010 Nikon presented also the AF-S 16-35 mm f/4G ED VR model and in 2013, they showed the Nikkor AF-S 18-35 mm f/3.5-4.5G ED, the successor of the Nikkor AF 18-35 mm f/3.5-4.5D IF-ED, a lens which they had in their line-up since 2000 I know that Nikon 18-35 (2013 model) is supper sharp lens and of a good quality , but Sigma 18-35 1.8 might be better ( as I was told at the store). I am looking for walk around lens that is sharp and able to produce good bokeh. Can somebody give me a feedback on Nikon 18-35 or/and Sigma 18-35 1.8. Thank you Planning to buy a wide angle lens. 16-35 mm f4 around 1600-1650 USD 17-55 mm f2.8 around 1600 USD 17-55 f2.8 should be better lens! Why 16-35 f4 is..
The AF-S NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED is an ultra wide-angle zoom lens that covers the ultra-wide to wide-angle 18-35mm range of focal lengths with a minimum focus distance of 28 cm. This high-performance lens is equipped with two ED and three aspherical lens elements for superior optical performance, yet weighs just 385 g and is compact enough to offer excellent portability Infatti come grandangolo zoom preferisco il Nikon AF-S 16-35 f/4G ED VR (circa 1100€). Oltre a costare 400€ in meno ritrovo in questo obiettivo alcuni vantaggi concreti: il primo è che pur partendo da 16mm contro i 14mm dell'altro,. Focal Length : 18-35 mm, Focus as close as 0.92 ft. from your subject Excellent choice for travel and architecture, landscape and everyday photography as well as HD-Video applications Nikon's exclusive Silent Wave Motor (SWM) provides ultra-fast, ultra-quiet autofocusing with seamless manual overrid The Nikon 14-24 and the Nikon 16-35 are the joint winners of this round. I was frankly surprised by the performance of the Canon 16-35 in the foliage and horizon tests. The Sigma clearly is in the sweet spot of its zoom range, but doesn't do enough to get out of the last place As the 17-35 is supposed to be inferior from an optical standpoint to the 16-35, I'd probably steer you towards the 16-35 based on what I've experienced with the other wide angle zooms. I just wish we had something as stellar as the Canon L 16-35 f4 IS :/ but the Nikon 16-35 f4 isn't nearly as bad as the reviews would lead you to believe, in fact I'd say it's quite good based on my limited.
Read our detailed comparison of the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose What is the difference between Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR and Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the Nikon camera lens ranking
Buy Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED Lens featuring F-Mount Lens/FX Format, Aperture Range: f/3.5 to f/29, Three Aspherical and Two ED Elements, Super Integrated Coating, Silent Wave Motor AF System, Rounded 7-Blade Diaphragm. Review Nikon nul The price for the 20mm 1.8 is $1300 and the 16-35 is $1500 in NZ. The lens sure is pricey, reason why I'm considering the 20mm 1.8 is that the fast lens may help with astro landscape photography also it produces nice sunstars which I don't know if the 16-35, 18-35g could produce Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S Nikkor User Reviews. Very well built and solid. I have seen and used the new 16-35 and would highly recommend that lens over this one Sigma 18-35 F1.8 DC HSM Preview; Nikon 40mm Micro 2.8 DX REVIEW; Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 ART Lens Preview; SIGMA 18-35 F1.8 Full RES Sample; Nikon 200-500 VS Sigma 150-600 Sport: Real World Review; It's Post Man FRO with a Package from SIGMA Corp; Sigma 150-600 Contemporary Real World Review: The BEST Wildlife / Sports lens for under $1,000 Read our detailed comparison of the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f4G ED VR vs Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f3.5-4.5G ED to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose
Landscapes, cityscapes and interiors often require an extra-wide-angle lens to capture the complete picture. With the AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR, you not only get focal lengths that cover a remarkably broad range, but your images will also benefit from the handheld steadiness of Nikon's VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization (2.5 stops*), sharp focusing and rich color rendition Benefits of the 16-35 f/4L IS include a slightly wider focal length, 77mm filter threads, image stabilization and enhanced fluorine lens coatings for top notch image quality. The 16-35 f/4L IS will allow you to use shutter speeds 4-stops slower to capture sharp images of static subjects while hand-holding the camera, thereby making tripod use less of a necessity (great for backpacking adventures) From a kit lens, I upgraded to Nikon 18-200mm (f/3.5-5.6) , but was looking to replace it with a wide angle zoom lens that fits my range better.The beautifully designed Nikon 16-35mm (f/4) had been my first choice, but I changed my mind at the last minute and settled on Nikon 18-35mm (f/3.5-4.5) .Here I share my thoughts leading up to my decision by comparing both lenses Buy Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Lens featuring F-Mount Lens/FX Format, Aperture Range: f/4 to f/22, Three Aspherical and Two ED Elements, Nano Crystal Coat, Silent Wave Motor AF System, VR II Image Stabilization, Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm. Review Nikon nul Read our detailed comparison of the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM vs Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f4G ED VR to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose
The 18-35 is variable aperture; the the 16-35 is constant. I've used the latter, and it's quite nice. Other than that, I'll bet there's little difference in build quality Lens Comparison: Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 VC vs. Canon 16-35 f/4 IS Matthew Gore · July 31, 2016 Those of you who follow my lens reviews may already know that this comparison of the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC and the Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS has been in the works for a year already The 18-35 v 20mm is something I'm going to have to think about again though, coming back to DSLR I want to keep mainly a prime setup for size (and still have the 35 f1.8G, 50 f1.8G and a 24 f2.8D) but the 18-35 is probably the one place I'm willing to compromise, less than £400 used and the IQ really is stellar, that said prices on the 20 f1.8 are falling now (especially the new 24 f1.8 is. The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED is an affordable ultra-wide angle lens. Aimed mainly at full-frame DSLR users, but also compatible with DX bodies, the Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 features built-in optical image stabilization. Read our in-depth Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR review complete with full-size sample images
Okay, so the current lenses I have now are a Nikon 28mm 2.8D and a Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom. I'm looking to get a new le Nikon 16-35mm or 18-35m Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-5.6 vs Nikon 16-35 f/4 VR— Crops at 21mm. Unlike the 18mm results, here at 21mm the 18-35 compares much more favorably to the 16-35, and might even be a bit better at f/4 - f/8 here in the center Amazon.in: Buy Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Lens for Nikon APS-C DSLRs (Black) online at low price in India on Amazon.in. Check out Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Lens for Nikon APS-C DSLRs (Black) reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more Sigma products online at best prices on Amazon.in This site is not responsible for any damage that the information on this site may cause to your system. It is illegal to copy or redistribute any information found on this site in any way without the expressed written consent of CO-NET Robert Olech Wydawc LensTip.com jest firma CO-NET Robert Olech. Adres wydawcy oraz redakcji: ul. wirki i Wigury 11/34 83-000 Pruszcz Gdask
Optics: 15 elements (including 4 special dispersion and 2 aspherical elements) in 10 groups vs. 18/13 for the Tamron 15-30mm, 12/8 for the Nikon and 13/12 for the Tokina. The new Tamron 17-35mm is the only lens in this group that employs fluorine coating on the front of its new lens to repel water, dust, and dirt and should make for easier cleaning Diglloyd's Advanced Photography (a subscription web site) has a systematic comparison of all the Nikon wide angle zooms - from the 14-24 to the old 18-35. His review suggests that the new 16-35 is generally a sharper lens than either of the old lenses (17-35 or 18-35) at most focal lengths and apertures. I have the old 18-35 and the new 16-35 Buy Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens for Nikon F featuring F-Mount Lens/DX Format, 27-52.5mm (35mm Equivalent), Aperture Range: f/1.8 to f/16, Five SLD Elements, Four Aspherical Elements, Super Multi-Layer Coating, Hyper Sonic Motor AF System, Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm. Review Sigma nul